Southern African Regional Poverty Network (SARPN) SARPN thematic photo
Country analysis > Mozambique Last update: 2020-11-27  
leftnavspacer
Search





 Related documents

Programme Aid Partners Performance Assessment (PAPPA) in Mozambique

Baseline survey on PAP performance in 2003

Report to the G-15 Programme Aid Partners and Government of Mozambique

by Richard Gerster (richard.gerster@gersterconsulting.ch) and Alan Harding

September 2004

Posted with permission of Richard Gerster of Gerster Consulting.
This report was orginally placed on the following website: www.gersterconsulting.ch
[Download complete version - 111Kb ~ 1 min (26 pages)]     [ Share with a friend  ]

This report was commissioned by the G15 Programme Aid Partners and was undertaken with the financial support of the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (seco), and the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID), respectively chair and co-chair of the G15 in 2004/05.

In Mozambique, donors have been providing co-ordinated and untied support to the state budget since 2000. The formal basis for budget and balance of payment (BoP) support operations is the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), signed on April 5, 2004, between the Republic of Mozambique, Belgium, Denmark, the European Commission, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and the World Bank (“G- 15”).

Signatories of the MoU declare in its § 3 that they are determined to work in the spirit of NEPAD, the Monterrey Consensus and the Rome Declaration on Harmonisation. The MoU was prepared in the spirit of mutual accountability. It systematically clarifies the performance and reporting commitments of the GoM as well as the Programme Aid Partners (PAPs). While the GoM is accountable based on the terms of its performance assessment framework (PAF), the G-15 have also signed up to specific commitments concerning how they will provide programme aid in future. These obligations are an effort to effectively implement the concerns of the Rome Declaration on Harmonisation. Art. 16 MoU obliges the donors to provide an annual report on their efforts in implementing these obligations. This initial report draws a baseline on donor performance in 2003, in order to be able to regularly monitor PAPs progress in future.

It should be noted that the signing of the new MoU in April 2004 was in itself a major step forward in the process of harmonising and aligning PAP’s support to the implementation of Mozambique’s poverty reduction strategy. It is a remarkable innovation that 15 donors agree to (1) have no conditionality outside the common performance assessment framework; (2) strongly enhance predictability; (3) align on the GoM cycle and documents. Future updates on this baseline survey will reflect the impact of this new agreement on donor performance.

Mozambique provides an excellent environment in which to improve aid effectiveness. The basis of this is the good working relationship between international funding agencies and the Government of Mozambique (GoM). Mozambique is also one of the most aid dependent countries in Africa and hence the potential returns from improving aid effectiveness are high. At present, out of total Official Development Assistance (ODA) of approximately USD 700 million annually, the programme aid1 share can be estimated at only 35-40 percent. The joint general budget support scheme represents the bulk of programme aid.

The findings on alignment and harmonisation, predictability, transparency, the administrative burden, and capacity building show that, even in the progressive environment for international cooperation that prevails in Mozambique there is considerable room for improvement. The untapped areas where further attention is required if PAP’s are to meet their new commitments under the MoU are specified in this report whereas the annexes contain detailed information at the agency level. Readers are referred to the shaded boxes at the end of each section which provide a summary of the main conclusions in each section of the report.

The portfolio overview demonstrates the considerable scope for rationalisation and further inter-agency co-operation that exists in many sectors. There is an even greater potential to improve aid effectiveness if the spirit of the MoU is applied to the overall portfolio beyond the general budget and BoP support component.

The cornerstone of the implementation of the PAPs’ obligations contained in the MoU is the development of a PAPs’ PAF. This facilitates the monitoring of PAP’s behaviour against commitments, exposes non-compliance and weaknesses to peer pressure, and strengthens PAPs accountability to GoM. The construction of such a PAF is the responsibility of the PAPs. The start of this process is facilitated by an initial proposal made in this report (see Section 4). A negotiation among PAPs and with the GoM should lead to an agreed PAF, linked to an action plan and timeframe for implementation. In the framework of the annual review cycle, the PAPs’ PAF becomes the basis for dialogue between the G-15 and GoM to assess collective and individual donor performance and to adapt the PAF on a continuous and rolling basis. In order to ensure credibility, monitoring of donor performance should be undertaken by an independent assessment team, with their annual reports released into the public domain – as has been agreed with this baseline report.

The G-15 should adopt a pro-active strategy to build mutual accountability to domestic and external stakeholders. Mozambican voices beyond the central government and PAPs demonstrate a need to clarify and account for the role of budget and BoP support. It is recommended that the G-15 disseminate the 2003 PAPPA Baseline widely and hosts a workshop to validate and discuss the baseline findings in dialogue with Mozambican stakeholders (GoM, parliament, civil society).

The findings of this report should also be disseminated at the Second High-Level Forum on Harmonization and Alignment for Aid Effectiveness, taking place in Paris in early 2005, as an example of good practice in achieving greater donor accountability at the country level.



Octoplus Information Solutions Top of page | Home | Contact SARPN | Disclaimer