SADC Food Security Network
Can regional markets, improved maize availability address acute food insecurity in 2003/04
… helping decision-makers maintain food security …
10 July 2003
The SADC Food Security Network Ministerial Brief is a joint product
of the FANR, the Regional Early Warning Unit, the Regional Remote
Sensing Unit, the Vulnerability Assessment Committee, the Database
Project and FANR’s key partners including USAID’s FEWS NET, SC
(UK), FAO and the FSRP/Zambia.
[Complete version - 268Kb ~ 1 min (2 pages)]
[ Share with a friend
The latest cereal balance sheet figures confirm that maize availability
at the national level looks more favorable than last year for
most countries in the region (although there are serious localized
problems in Mozambique, Swaziland and also Tanzania, and Zimbabwe
continues to have serious problems - see next page). There
will continue to be import needs in several countries and a number
of important questions arise from this:
- Can the required maize be sourced from within the region?
- What will or should be the balance between commercial imports and food aid in meeting the gap?
- Is food aid - either imported or domestically sourced - the most appropriate emergency intervention option?
Can the required maize be sourced from within the region?
The estimated South African maize surplus of 3.76 million MT
would easily cover the needs of the region (see graph below).
Thus, in terms of pure quantity, this implies that there would be no
need to source outside the region. This is in stark contrast to last
year when there was a regional maize deficit of over 3 million MT.
Whether countries will choose to import from RSA will depend, however,
on the costs of doing so. Of interest in this regard is the exchange
rate movements of the US dollar against the Rand. The
recent depreciation of the dollar against the rand means that the
cost of importing South African maize will have increased relative to
the cost of importing cereal denominated in US$ from outside the
region. In addition, some of the South African surplus will be exported
outside of the region.
Intra-regional movements of cereals (excluding RSA):
informal cross-border movements of cereals, particularly maize
are inevitable and were a major source of food last year in Malawi
and Zambia in particular. Much of the large surpluses in the northern
and central parts of Mozambique are likely to end up in Malawi
and Zimbabwe, despite a Zambian government ban on the import or
export of maize, significant informal flows are possible . For food
aid, the World Food Programme has said that it will try and source
from within the region.
The existence of considerable surpluses
in parts of Malawi, Zambia and Mozambique opens up the
possibility of deficit populations being assisted by intra-country grain movements either through market forces and/or interventions. In Zambia,
there seems to be general agreement that there will be pockets of
acute food insecurity this year, as there are in most years. Similarly,
despite the good harvest in Malawi, WFP estimates that 400,000 people
in nine districts are expected to face unusually acute food insecurity
this year due to crop failure. Market forces will play a role here, and
this should be encouraged by ensuring good and timely market information
to grain traders and transporters. In Mozambique, despite the
transport difficulties the WFP/ FAO Crop and Food Supply Assessment
Mission (CFSAM) estimates that some 35,000 MT of maize could be
procured from the surplus areas in the North to the deficit South.
What will or should be the balance between commercial imports
and food aid in meeting the gap?
The CFSAM missions in Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Swaziland,
Zambia and Zimbabwe have calculated total maize import requirements
split between commercial imports and food aid. Calculations have also
been made of food aid requirements that will or could be purchased
locally (see table).
Maize Import Requirements, Maize Food Aid and Estimated Number
of Food Insecure People
Source: WFP/FAO CFSAM reports (All figures rounded up to the nearest 1,000)
Is food aid - either imported or domestically sourced - the most appropriate emergency intervention option?
The population figures in the table are numbers of people who are
estimated to have inadequate access to food over the 2003-04 period.
Access to food can be assured in different ways. One is by providing
food directly, perhaps in return for work or as pure food aid; another is
lowering the price of food by intervening in the market; a third way is to
increase purchasing power by supplementing incomes: “cash-aid” or
“cash for work”. These interventions can theoretically be used separately
or in combination. The question thus arises: given the current
and likely future food security and market situation in different Southern
African countries, what is the most appropriate intervention? The answer
to this question depends on a number of further issues which require
investigation. Chief among these is an analysis of the market
situation in the food deficit areas in question: is food available on the
market at a price that would be considered normal (or below normal) for
this time of year. If the answer to this question is yes, then food aid (at
least for the able bodied) is not appropriate, and cash based systems
such as voucher schemes should be considered. If food is not available
on the market and / or prices are unseasonably high then this
swings the pendulum back to food aid. Experience in other parts of
Africa further suggests that intervening agencies should consider implementing
flexible programmes that can switch from food to cash or vice
versa as market conditions change. The need for a rigorous market
analysis is thus essential in deciding upon the mix between food
and cash relief. It should, however, be noted that some form of
carefully targeted food aid may be necessary regardless of market
conditions for destitute populations and certain types of HIV/AIDS
A joint SADC-UN Regional Consultation on Humanitarian Assistance
was held in Johannesburg on June 11th - 12th. The regional
consultation brought together stakeholders involved with the humanitarian
assistance needs and response in southern Africa, especially
regarding the six countries covered by the current UN Regional
Appeal (Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Swaziland, Zambia
and Zimbabwe). It provided a forum to discuss regional and country
level emergency needs as well as to support longer-term development
objectives. The meeting was co-chaired by Ms. Judith Lewis,
Regional Coordinator of the Secretary General’s Special Envoy for
Humanitarian Needs in Southern Africa, and Dr. Prega Ramsamy,
Executive Secretary of SADC.
Some of the major findings of the meeting were:
See: The Southern African Humanitarian Information Network
http://www.sahims.net for more details.
- Food Access: Although food availability has improved significantly
this year, access to food remains a major concern, especially
for communities and families who have not yet recovered
from the strains of last year, or who fully exhausted their assets or
engaged in negative coping strategies for their survival. There is
clearly a need to continue to strengthen the vulnerability assessment
process to help all stakeholders understand magnitude and
nature of vulnerability in the region.
- Targeting: Some emergency food assistance will be necessary
this year, but should be increasingly targeted to the most vulnerable.
Wherever possible, local/regional production should be
used for food aid rather than importing, in order to avoid distortion
in local markets and to encourage local production. Furthering
recovery for next year will require immediate actions to ensure
necessary seeds and other agricultural inputs for households that
do not have the means to purchase them.
- HIV/AIDS: The negative impacts of HIV/AIDS have led to
“compounded vulnerability” in affected households, communities
and societies. More work needs to be done to quantify the impact
of HIV/AIDS on households and on institutional capacity and to
better understand the dynamics between HIV/AIDS, food security
and governance. HIV/AIDS needs to be mainstreamed into emergency
assistance, and longer-term approaches need to develop
community safety net and treatment strategies for People Living
With HIV/AIDS (PLWHA).
- Agricultural Sector: Structural problems in the agricultural sector
need to be addressed now e.g. market reforms, improving extension services, promoting trade within and across the region and
reviewing policies. Private sector partnerships will be essential
in addressing the long-term problems of food insecurity in the
- Nutrition: Across the region, whilst Global Acute Malnutrition
(GAM) rates remained relatively low over the last year, there is a
tendency towards deterioration in underweight in children under 5
years old form the mid-1990s onwards. Although GAM levels are
within an acceptable range, the levels of severe malnutrition are
of great concern.
- Short and Long-term Actions: Immediate actions need to be
taken in order to ensure longer-term results, and should be undertaken
in conjunction with ongoing emergency assistance. Government,
UN, SADC, NGOs and donors need to “run the marathon
together” - to undertake sustained interventions that provide
immediate support for vulnerable people, as well as make longer
–term investments in the future of the countries of the region (e.g.
education, health etc.)
SADC SEED SECURITY OUTLOOK
In a soon to be issued report, the SADC Seed Security Network estimates
seed availability for the 2003/04 growing season. Of particular
concern is Zimbabwe, which is expected to experience a deficit
of 40,000 MT of maize seed (expected demand is 60,000 MT). Soybean
seed should be adequate, and a surplus of 1,000 MT of cotton
seed is expected, however a deficit of about 3,000 MT of open pollinated
sorghum seed is expected. A further deficit of 120 metric
tones of groundnut seed and 1,100 MT of millet seed is also foreseen.
The critical seed shortages are attributed to a combination of
climatic factors, diseases and the land reform programme. On the
latter, the role of the formerly strong commercial sector in certified
seed production has not been sustained. The Seed Security Network
“Resettled farmers are yet to acquire experience in seed production.
Some of them lack essential resources for seed production. A
further draw back experienced this season concerns the security of
seed crops. Most of the crops are in deficit due to thefts of seed
from fields which has been reported by seed growers and seed
Due to the magnitude of the deficit, it is envisaged that seed will
have to be imported from sources within the region.
Elsewhere in the region, current information indicates a mixed pattern.
Prospects for seed availability for the growing season 2003/04
is largely favorable for South Africa, Mozambique, Malawi, Seychelles
and Mauritius which have adequate seed. Detailed information
from South Africa is difficult to obtain however the general
indication is that the country will have enough seed for both local
and export demands. Botswana and Zambia will experience a slight
reduction in seed and require to source seed from within the region.
At the time of writing, there was no information on seed prospects
for Angola, Namibia, Lesotho and Swaziland.
Seed availability at country level is hampered by the difficulties in
moving seeds between countries in the region. Current seed regulations
in the SADC region are not friendly to regional seed trade
and continue to act as barriers. The SADC Seed Security Network
is working to harmonize seed regulations so as to foster intraregional
ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY IN ZIMBABWE 2003-04
Zimbabwe: % of rural population experiencing a cereal gap, by district, over time, July 2003- January 2004
The recently completed ZimVAC Emergency Food Security and Vulnerability Assessment has estimated
the numbers and locations of food secure persons over the 2003/04 consumption year.
The series of maps opposite show the spatial distribution of the food insecure rural population through time.
Note that the situation will start to worsen notably by October 2003 in most southern, southeastern, southwestern
and northern parts of the country. The numbers in need continue to rise towards the end of the
marketing year, and from January 2004 the southwestern and northwestern parts of the country will be the
Rural Zimbabwe’s food security problems and outlook for the coming season are a product of both
availability and access issues. In the traditional staple cereal deficit districts to the southern, western and
the extreme northern areas of the country, maize and millet prices remain significantly higher - between 320
and 400 percent - than those prevailing in the greater parts of northern district that got some harvest in the
Availability of maize grain, millets, milk, cooking oil, flour and bread has improved, but access remains
the major factor limiting improved household food security in most urban centres. Inflation for May 2003
was estimated at 300.1 percent and economic analysts have revised their end of year inflation estimate to
between 700 and 1,000 percent. It continues to erode the purchasing power of consumers and access to