Southern African Regional Poverty Network 
  Workshop tools  |  Programme  |  Participants  |  Case studies  |  Report  |  Papers  |  Resource documents  |  Links


Case studies > Malawi, Kenya

Mitigating through improved services delivery

Two case studies:

  1. Conservation Agriculture equipment for Bondo (Kenya) farmers


  2. Seedpacks and treadle pumps for Mulanje and Thyolo Districts in Malawi
Issues and Challenges

  • Extension service quality, intensity & HIV mitigation focus (Social extension: FFS, FLS, PEA etc. manuals, videos etc. available)


  • Traditional practices that worsen the situation (wife inheritance and loss of draft animals to funerals)


  • Appropriate farmer empowerment and entry point (needs assessment, which technology, sustainability etc.)


  • Multi-sectoral approach and coordination (farmer does not think or act sectorally)


  • Linkages: from farm to local leadership and nationally to policy level (inclusiveness, bottom-up approach)


  • Responsiveness, capacity and resilience (home-grown?)


  • Roles of NGO, private sector versus government (Forums for cooperation and planning)


  • URGENT: Communities needed help yesterday!


  • Paradigm shift (especially to favour group and social approaches) > process versus prescriptive


  • How to advance a concept or a position specific to HIV/AIDS


  • Not sure interventions so far have brought about behavioural change (command approaches, campaign)


  • Current system has mostly relied on medical interventions (condoms and drugs


  • How do we close the gaps in knowledge
Million $ Question(s)???

  • What makes the intervention an HIV/AIDS mitigation?


  • What is different now from non-HIV times of the past?


  • How will we be sure to reach the most disadvantaged this time round (when they are even weaker ??)
Way forward
Scenic Structure: Creating awareness, postering understanding of what is happening now for countering vulnerability with resilience…

  • Identify local issues that need to be discussed and processed, determine what is needed and build interventions on what exists…


  • Set the scene for Government, NGO private sector and farmers forum
Build agents of change in extension capacity under the new paradigm

  • multi- disciplinary,


  • old skills re-forged and applied anew,


  • farmers, priests etc as extension agents (ToT),


  • train those with an eye for opportunistic innovation


  • Integrate efforts with the health and other actors (paradigm change in medical, finance etc.)
Radical and swift action is needed:

  • let the infected and affected discuss and express needs and suggestions for action


  • talk about HIV even at funerals!


  • take discussions beyond the immediate cause


  • let FFSs and PEAs discuss change in traditional practices that curtail intervention action


  • Build on these to find wider determinants of the situations we are in, hence a chance for workable solutions.


  • Action research has an important role (yet already existing extension approaches/manuals and other tools have to be applied as widely as possible NOW!)


  • Build into the characteristics and cultural norms of the most vulnerable (gender roles e.g. widows will not plough, must hire labour etc.)


  • Those more able can build food banks for the sick and destitute


  • Church groups, youth groups discussing HIV/AIDS (youth and family extension)


  • Set-up community health systems e.g. Angola


  • Small stock multiplication programme (HPI style)


  • Exploit local level resource and ID community entrepreneurs (and use them)


  • Scale-up is in contiguum (systemic), multi-disciplinary and co-ordination approach


  • Correct mistakes of the past in approaches and inclusiveness


  • Set well-represented HIV/AIDS policy and planning committee with links to the ongoing activities


  • Policy development need nationals from within (in-house) who know the strengths and weaknesses


  • Equip policy makers with “learning by doing” skill (case of Uganda)
Next Steps...
  • Link this roundtable with the ongoing, from community, to institutions, to policy


  • Join efforts with SADC – FANR-PAN – SAPES Trust, NEPAD (linking HIV to agriculture)


  • Let us be a lobbying group with an advocacy pro-active agenda


  • Aim for convincing, head-on action: Set tasks and targets of which we can meet again later and gauge progress, in front of a wider audience.


  • Add to action-research efforts (Р‚ and $ will be needed, write proposals and link with + people)


  • Establish conceptual approaches and models to help convince donors that our proposed ways are the best to follow


  • Build ourselves into a forum or network, that will attract others to link and share with us


  • Invite ourselves to other and high level fora and increase the number of people involved
 
Main organisers:
Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations | Deutsche Gesellschaft fСЊr Technische Zusammenarbeit | Human Sciences Research Council | Oxfam | Save the Children UK | United Nations Development Programme