SARPN Home

POVERTY, ENERGY & GENDER
[Back to papers]

Seminar paper by Daniel Motinga


Energy, Poverty and Gender: A Situational Analysis


by Daniel Motinga
NEPRU



1. Introduction
 
  • There is a connection between access to modern energy services and development


  • Improved access to energy services are necessary for development


  • Majority of poor depend on biomass fuels for energy needs


  • Women are at the center of the energy economy of the poor and marginalized


  • Time and energy poverty lead to income poverty


  • Poverty, particularly for women is more than income deficiency


  • QUESTION? How do we change this state of affairs? “In search of the missing links?”


2. Conceptualizing poverty

  • Inability of an individual, family or a household to meet basic needs or minimal standards


  • Market failures central to the process of impoverishment-“entitlement failures” result


  • Thus, poverty not simply a matter of few assets but importantly about constraints (Carter and May, 1999).


  • Poverty has many dimensions—important to consider absolute and relative poverty


  • Caveat—norms used as measures of poverty differ in time and space


  • Distinction needed between transient and chronic poverty—because the causes differ; meaning strategies should differ


  • Nevertheless, income remains a good proxy of poverty, as it is a key determinant of other aspects of welfare!


3. Linking gender, energy and poverty



4. Energy, poverty and gender in space

Country % Of rural population 1995 GNP per head (US%) Energy consumption (kgoe') 1994 Access to electricity 1999 Biomass consumption 1993
Angola 67.8 340 89 9 59.1
Botswana 69.2 3.020 387 13 -
DRC 70.9 110 45 5 83.5
Lesotho 76.9 670 - 3 -
Malawi 86.5 180 39 3.2 86.4
Mauritius 59.4 3.690 387 5 47.2
Mozambique 65.8 90 40 5 85.3
Namibia 62.6 2.080 - 11 -
Seychelles 34.9 6.960 - - -
South Africa 49.2 3.140 2.146 48 -
Swaziland 60.8 - - 14 -
Tanzania 75.6 130 34 5 89.3
Zambia 56.9 430 149 10 71
Zimbabwe 67.9 620 438 17 25.6
Total 65.9 3754 16.2 'low' 'high'


5. Summary and way forward

  • A situational analysis was presented!


  • Challenges remain for SADC governments in terms of providing electricity for 84% of the masses without access to electricity


  • Globally, approximately 2billion people do not have access to modern forms of energy such as electricity


  • Women and children bore the responsibility of managing the energy economy of poor households


  • Because of poverty, conventional modern forms of energy (fossils fuels, and electricity) will remain the fuel of first choice for many poor households for many years to come, while biomass fuels will remain the main fuel of necessity (Barnett, 2000).


  • Intervention needed to change such grim prospects!


  • I THANK YOU FOR LISTENING!