-
The land crisis in Zimbabwe, which has captured so much international attention, is both part of a wider crisis of governance there and has also had major repercussions throughout the Southern Africa region. It has concentrated the minds of some, but has also frightened and frozen the actions of others.
-
Indeed, progress on land reform in the region has slowed rather than quickened in the three years since the Zimbabwean crisis broke in March 2000. Mindful of this continuing impasse in land reform and its implementation across the region, 14 concerned and committed specialists working on land reform in the region from a variety of backgrounds – researchers, trainers, technical advisers, trade unionists, donors and consultants (see Appendix I) – met informally in Pretoria on 1-2 March 2003 at the invitation of the FAO Regional Office in Harare.1
-
Our objective was to analyse the constraints to sustainable land reform and to try to understand better some of the common points and specific features of the countries in which we work. Our informal group also sought – not without difficulty - to identify ways and means of moving things forward. These brief notes, written collaboratively since that meeting, set out a synthesis of our discussions and subsequent exchanges, and are designed to be of interest and help to others also grappling with these issues. They are followed by a country by country review (Appendix II) of the status of land reform in each country, and a matrix (Appendix III) providing an overview of current land issues in the region.
-
Our meeting covered the length and breadth of land reform in the region. The events in Zimbabwe and their repercussions, both within the country itself and in South Africa and Namibia, naturally dominated our discussions. In the time available, land tenure reform (as opposed to redistributive land reform) was only touched upon, partly because it is a less immediate issue. However, we recognised that tenure arrangements on land occupied and used by the majority of African farmers – women and men - in the region remain deeply flawed and insecure. Even where good laws are in place implementation is uneven and often tends to favour distinct interest groups.
Footnote:
-
This paper does not reflect or represent the opinions of Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), but the group is solely responsible for the views expressed in the paper.
|
