Southern African Regional Poverty Network (SARPN) SARPN thematic photo
Events Last update: 2020-11-27  
leftnavspacer
Search





 Related documents


Seminar on the impact of HIV/AIDS on land reform in KwaZulu-Natal

Hosted by the Southern African Regional Poverty Network and the Centre for HIV/AIDS Networking University of Natal, Durban

Scott Drimie      and      Deborah Heustice
[Briefing note]     [Seminar proceedings]     [Delegates]     [Annexures]

Seminar proceedings

[previous] [table of contents] [1.1] [1.2] [1.3] [1.4] [1.5] [2.1] [2.2] [2.3] [3.1] [3.2] [3.3] [4.1] [4.2] [4.3] [5.1] [5.2] [5.3] [5.4] [5.5] [next]

2. Overview of the current situation

2.1. The impact of HIV/AIDS on land reform
- Mr Dan Mullins, Oxfam-GB

Mr Mullins set the scene for the seminar with an overview of the current and potential impact of HIV/AIDS on land reform and agriculture, categorizing the impact into three areas: people / households, use of resources and institutions. He indicated that an important starting point is to look at the phases through which people progress when they have HIV/AIDS: asymptomatic; early illness; chronic illness; critical illness; death and lastly, survivors.

Each phase of the disease is associated with a different impact. It is important to note that there is another category on this continuum beyond death of the infected person, that is, the category of survivors. HIV/AIDS has a massive impact on those left living – there are many more affected than infected people. Mr Mullins referred delegates to the diagram below, which shows the value of use of micro credit at various stages of illness to reduce vulnerability of households. That is, households with a stronger economic safety net and a wider range of options (including land) to draw upon during the crisis are less vulnerable at each stage of the continuum of HIV/AIDS illness than their poorer counterparts. Policy makers and planners need to note this as it affects the relevance of their interventions in any community.

The effect of HIV/AIDS on households/livelihood strategies


The dotted line represents the rate of degradation experienced by a household with a stronger economic safety net and a wider range of options (including land) to draw upon during the crisis. The other line represents the rate of economic degradation experienced by a household with a weaker safety net. The different rates of degradation appear to pivot on the presence or absence of physical assets, business income and access to credit or savings.

Turning next to the impact HIV/AIDS has on people and households, he indicated that there is a general pattern as people move along the continuum of HIV/AIDS illness. We know from statistics that HIV/AIDS is affects the most economically productive members of the population. At a household level the impact of this are significant with labour, skills and experience, income and expenditure of the household all being affected. Briefly, as illness progresses so the ability of the infected person to earn an income is reduced, the household looses its primary source of income, placing a strain on household income and resources. Loss of skills and experience is also a growing problem as the most productive members of the household die before they are able to pass on their experience and specialist skills to the next generation. This reduces the ability of other members of the household to recover from expenses incurred. Further pressure is also placed on the household budget as cash is used to pay for medication, and time of family members is diverted away from other activities (like farming) to caring for the sick. Households' ability to cope will also depend on the extent to which they can adapt to the changes in household composition (age, gender) brought about by HIV/AIDS, and their ability to take on new roles and responsibilities. Policy makers and planners need to note these changing relationships in households as they will affect both with whom they engage and how they plan interventions.

HIV/AIDS also impacts on the use of resources. Ill health, and time spend in caring for sick, reduces time spent in farming, leading to under utilization of resources and reduced productivity. In some cases this has resulted in changing use of land as households move away from more to less labour intensive, and often less nutritious, type of crops. In some cases land has even been left fallow or abandoned. Other households have been tempted to rent out or sell their land in order to raise extra income to meet additional household expenses due to HIV/AIDS. Selling off productive resources like land and farming implements has critical long-term implications for the household, increasing their vulnerability and sustainability in the long term. Forced removal of widows from land and property grabbing has also become issues that need urgent attention from policy makers and land officials.

Mr Mullins also looked at the impact of HIV/AIDS on institutions such as health, welfare and the Department of Land Affairs and Agriculture. HIV/AIDS has implications for their sustainability, effectiveness and ability to cope with increased demands. He noted that HIV/AIDS would increasingly impact on and change the environment of institutions. People and cliental, as well as ways of working with people, will change; and there is likely to be a significant effect on morale. The internal capacity of organisations will also be affected as more staff become infected and affected. Most notably, as infection rates increase, so too will absenteeism and staff productivity decrease. This will be coupled with increasing financial costs to the institution in retraining staff to replace those who fall ill and die, severance and hiring, loss of time, drain on medical aid funds, increased death benefits and pension payouts. Staff turnover will also increase as staff get sick and need to be replaced, and competition for skilled staff will increase as the pool of skilled and experienced individuals is reduced.

He said the result of the above scenario is that we need to assess and reassess regularly the quality and relevance of the current services our institutions provide. We may find that we need to be addressing things differently. We should also be asking what we should be doing to safeguard our business and ourselves so that we are sustainable in the future.

[previous] [table of contents] [1.1] [1.2] [1.3] [1.4] [1.5] [2.1] [2.2] [2.3] [3.1] [3.2] [3.3] [4.1] [4.2] [4.3] [5.1] [5.2] [5.3] [5.4] [5.5] [next]


Octoplus Information Solutions Top of page | Home | Contact SARPN | Disclaimer